Skip to main content
photo of a stack of newspapers

Albuquerque Journal Subscription Auto Renewal Investigation

In today’s digital age, the convenience of subscription services has become an integral part of our lives. Whether it’s streaming content, software, or online magazines, these subscriptions promise a hassle-free experience. However, lurking beneath this convenience is a sinister world of deceptive auto-renewal subscription fraud. Unbeknownst to many, unscrupulous businesses have mastered the art of exploiting our busy lives, locking us into recurring payments without our consent or understanding.

The Lyon Firm is committed to unmasking the hidden dangers of auto-renewal subscription fraud associated with the Albuquerque Journal. We can help you take back control of your digital subscriptions, and seek compensation for your losses.

albuquerque journal subscription terms


What Are the Top 5 Automatic Renewal Law Violations?

Automatic renewal law violations refer to instances where a company or business fails to comply with legal requirements and regulations governing automatic subscription renewals and recurring billing arrangements.

These laws are designed to protect consumers from deceptive billing practices and ensure transparency and fairness in subscription-based services. Violations of these laws can lead to legal consequences and penalties for the business engaging in such practices.

Here are five common examples of automatic renewal law violations:

  1. Failure to Obtain Affirmative Consent: In numerous jurisdictions, companies are required to obtain the consumer’s affirmative consent or express authorization before enrolling them in an automatic renewal program. Violations occur when companies sign consumers up for recurring billing without their explicit permission or by using pre-checked boxes on websites.
  2. Difficulty in Canceling or Opting Out: Automatic renewal laws often mandate that companies make it as easy to cancel or opt out of the subscription as it was to sign up. Violations occur when companies make it intentionally difficult or time-consuming for consumers to cancel or opt out, such as requiring phone calls during specific hours or multiple steps to cancel.
  3. Failure to Provide Notice of Upcoming Renewal: Some laws require businesses to send reminders to customers before their subscriptions automatically renew. Violations occur when this notice is not provided, or if it does not give consumers sufficient time to cancel if they wish to do so.
  4. Ignoring Cancellation Requests: Failing to honor consumers’ valid cancellation requests is a violation of automatic renewal laws. Companies are typically required to promptly acknowledge and process cancellation requests.
  5. Refusing Refunds: In some cases, businesses may be required to offer refunds to consumers who cancel within a specific timeframe. Violations occur when companies refuse to provide refunds to eligible customers.

Automatic renewal law violations can result in legal actions, fines, and penalties for the businesses involved. It’s essential for both consumers and businesses to be aware of these laws and regulations to ensure fair and transparent subscription practices.

What Damages Are Available in Deceptive Billing Scheme Lawsuits?

In lawsuits related to deceptive billing schemes, several types of damages may be available to the plaintiffs, depending on the specific circumstances and the applicable laws. These damages aim to compensate the victims for their losses and deter the wrongdoers from engaging in deceptive billing practices in the future.

Here are some common types of damages that may be available in such lawsuits:

  • Compensatory Damages: Compensatory damages are intended to reimburse the victim for the actual financial losses they incurred as a result of the deceptive billing scheme. This can include the amount of money overcharged or wrongly billed, along with any out-of-pocket expenses directly related to the deceptive billing.
  • Restitution: Restitution is a specific type of compensatory damages where the defendant is required to return the ill-gotten gains or profits obtained through the deceptive billing scheme. It aims to put the victim back in the financial position they would have been in had the deception not occurred.
  • Punitive Damages: Punitive damages, also known as exemplary damages, go beyond compensating the victim. They are intended to punish the wrongdoer for their misconduct and deter others from engaging in similar deceptive practices. To receive punitive damages, the plaintiff typically needs to show that the defendant’s actions were particularly egregious, willful, or malicious.
  • Injunctive Relief: In addition to monetary damages, a court may issue an injunction to prevent the defendant from continuing the deceptive billing scheme. This can be a crucial remedy to stop ongoing harm and protect future consumers from falling victim to the same practices.
  • Class Action or Collective Action Awards: Deceptive billing schemes often affect multiple consumers. In such cases, a class action or collective action lawsuit may be initiated, and if successful, damages can be distributed to all affected class members.

It’s important to note that the availability and extent of damages in deceptive billing scheme lawsuits can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific laws applicable. Additionally, the plaintiff’s ability to recover these damages may depend on their ability to prove the deceptive nature of the billing and the resulting harm. Consulting with an attorney experienced in consumer protection and deceptive billing cases can provide valuable guidance on the potential damages available in your specific situation.