Surgical procedures for patients have certain risks, such as risks from anesthesia and hospital-born infections. Some patients also face complications from poorly executed procedures.
In rare cases, surgeons and nurses may forget to remove a sponge, needle or other surgical instruments before closing an incision. In fact, thousands of patients a year leave operating rooms with surgical items lodged in their bodies.
The majority of cases of retained surgical instruments involve gauze and cotton sponges used throughout operations to soak up blood and other fluids. Instruments used to properly perform the surgery are supposed to be counted by a surgical team so that the mistake of a retained foreign instrument does not occur. If a sponge, needle or blade is retained, an injury is likely to follow. Other surgical items that may be retained patients are:
The John Hopkins Institute found that surgical items are left inside of patients around 39 times a week in the U.S. These Surgical Injury are sometimes referred to as “never events” because they are so serious that medical professionals agree they should never occur. Unfortunately, these medical mistakes do occur and can cause severe health complications.
Joe Lyon is a highly-rated hospital negligence attorney and medical malpractice lawyer representing plaintiffs nationwide in a wide variety of civil litigation claims.
Because medical sponges are designed to soak up fluid, they often blend in with the operating anatomy of a patient and hidden within the body cavity. If proper procedures are not followed, they can be forgotten by a medical team.
Patients who suffer from retained sponges are hit with life-threatening infections and must seek medical attention. A corrective surgery will be necessary and in serious cases may mean removing sections of intestine or colon and can lead to disabling conditions.
These events can be prevented by following proper medical protocol, such as the use of bar-coded or radio frequency-tagged surgical instruments. This ensures that after a surgery, all items can be accounted for without resorting to a simple counting which can be susceptible to human error. But not every hospital and surgical center has adopted available technologies that help eliminate the risk of leaving sponges in patients.
There is no standardized procedure for accounting for medical items from hospital to hospital. A review of government data and legal records suggests that far more people may be victims of lost surgical objects than prior estimates report. There’s no federal reporting requirement when hospitals leave sponges or other items in patients. Sponges account for more than two-thirds of all incidents.
Typically patients with a retained sponge must undergo a second surgical procedure and are faced with common operational risks. Retained sponges may sit in a patient’s body for months before being discovered.
When this occurs, potential health risks include developing a serious infection. Sponges, clamps and other items are attacked by the body’s immune system. When the foreign body retained is a scalpel, clamp or other sharp object, patients can face potential lacerations of vital organs.
When any patient is admitted to hospital for a surgical procedure, there is a reasonable expectation that the attending surgeon and team of medical professionals will do their best to perform a successful operation. The thought of professionals accounting for all instruments and sponges after the procedure should not cross your mind. This kind of gross negligence or malpractice is basis for a legal claim.
A surgeon is responsible to ensure that all objects are accounted for, and a failure to do so is a failure of duty. Patients who suffer an infection or a laceration caused by a retained foreign body are clear injuries. Medical malpractice cases can be very difficult to win, however a retained sponge or instrument is clearly a breach of duty by the surgeon or nurse and settlement compensation is very likely.
ABOUT THE LYON FIRM
Joseph Lyon has 17 years of experience representing individuals in complex litigation matters. He has represented individuals in every state against many of the largest companies in the world.
The Firm focuses on single-event civil cases and class actions involving corporate neglect & fraud, toxic exposure, product defects & recalls, medical malpractice, and invasion of privacy.
NO COST UNLESS WE WIN
The Firm offers contingency fees, advancing all costs of the litigation, and accepting the full financial risk, allowing our clients full access to the legal system while reducing the financial stress while they focus on their healthcare and financial needs.
When management or individuals fail to provide a sufficient level of care, victims may seek legal recourse and file suit against the negligent parties. Medical malpractice lawsuits improve the quality of healthcare by holding physicians and hospitals responsible when they fall below a professional standard of care.
Hospitals, medical staff, nurses and doctors are responsible for providing proper patient care. When management or individuals fail to provide a sufficient level of care, victims may seek legal recourse and file suit against the negligent parties.
Without medical malpractice laws, medical mistakes would go without consequence, patients would be uncompensated for preventable injuries, and medical providers would have less incentive to improve the medical system to prevent future injuries.
Despite the reports discussed above, frivolous claims brought by medical malpractice attorneys and runaway juries have been blamed as causing a medical crisis. There is no medical malpractice crisis, it is simply propaganda created by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and large insurance companies to pollute the American jury pool and change the law in a manner that is favorable to them and adverse to the average American. And sadly, it has worked.
Currently, 90 percent of juries side with the physician over the patient at trial. As a result, insurance companies are bolder than ever and refuse at times to settle even the most meritorious of cases knowing that the chances of the patient finding a fair and impartial jury is extremely low, especially in more conservative parties of the country such as Hamilton County, Ohio.
The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 required that conditions be identified that (a) are costly and occur at high rates, (b) are assigned as cases to the Diagnosis-Related Group, and (c) could have ultimately been prevented with appropriate care. These hospital-acquired conditions occur as negligence on the part of hospital staff and often result in a multitude of medical malpractice lawsuits.
Conditions that meet the three requirements for identification:
Many hospitals and physicians are taking proactive approaches to resolve viable medical malpractice claims by approaching patients who do not have legal counsel. The “family meeting” presentation will include deterring patients from seeking legal counsel. This is a very concerning development in the course of medical liability and risk management.
We strongly advise patients not to engage in “family meeting” settlement negotiations without an experienced Cincinnati medical malpractice lawyer present. Hospitals and physicians have lawyers who are specialized in medical malpractice claims advising them on how to approach the case, and it is only fair that the patient is afforded the same benefit of qualified counsel.
The “family meeting” practice of settling hospital negligence cases without an attorney does not benefit the patient in most cases, but almost always benefits the negligent hospital.
Do not be deterred by a hospital representative implying that the case will be compromised if you seek counsel. While attorney fees will need to be paid, those costs should not be a deterrent. The Lyon Firm adopts a lower contingency fee structure and offers hourly rates for cases that can be resolved without litigation.
If the parties wish to resolve the matter, having qualified counsel on both sides is beneficial to the process. The goal should be a settlement where both parties are satisfied, not a case where the hospital pays substantially less than the fair value of the claim.
There are numerous issues that need to be considered before settling a medical malpractice case, and you should know what the fair value of the claim is before accepting a settlement.
The hospital knows the fair value having been involved in other cases. You as the patient should work with counsel who has successfully worked on other cases and can advise on the appropriate risk of future litigation and settlement value.
If a hospital is approaching you or a family member about a settlement without a Cincinnati Medical Malpractice lawyer, please call (800) 513-2403 for a free consultation.
Our Firm will help you find the answers. The Firm has the experience, resources and dedication to take on difficult and emotional cases and help our clients obtain the justice for the wrong they have suffered.
Experience: Joe Lyon is an experienced Cincinnati Medical Malpractice Lawyer. The Lyon Firm has 17 years of experience and success representing individuals and plaintiffs in all fifty states, and in a variety of complex civil litigation matters. Medical malpractice lawsuits can be complex and require industry experts to determine the root cause of an accident or injury. Mr. Lyon has worked with experts nationwide to assist individuals understand why an injury occurred and what can be done to improve their lives in the future. Some cases may go to a jury trial, though many others can be settled out of court.
Resources/Dedication: Mr. Lyon has worked with experts in the fields of accident reconstruction, biomechanics, epidemiology, metallurgy, pharmacology, toxicology, human factors, workplace safety, life care planning, economics, and virtually every medical discipline in successfully representing Plaintiffs across numerous areas of law. The Lyon Firm is dedicated to building the strongest cases possible for clients and their critical interests.
Results: Mr. Lyon has obtained numerous seven and six figure results in personal injury, automotive product liability, medical Negligence, construction accidents, and auto dealership negligence cases. The cases have involved successfully litigating against some of the largest companies in the world
The process for investigating a medical malpractice claims involves the following steps:
The Lyon Firm aggressively, professionally, and passionately advocates for injured individuals and families against companies due to a defective product or recalled product to obtain just compensation under the law.
(Cincinnati, Ohio): Confidential settlement for a family due to a wrongful death. An emergency room physician failed to recognize the common symptoms associated with bowel obstruction and prescribed a contraindicated medicine of GoLytley. The patient died at home the day of discharge after taking the medication. The case against the emergency room physician was resolved by settlement following extensive discovery. The settlement was paid to the spouse and surviving adult children for the loss of their mother. While no amount of money could bring back their mother, the case provided answers and held the hospital accountable.
(Cincinnati, Ohio): Joe Lyon was second chair in a case involving the failure of a physician to promptly communicate a positive breast cancer result to a patient. As a result of the delay, the cancer progressed from in situ carcinoma to stage 3B with lymph node involvement. The treatment required mastectomy and radiation/ chemotherapy rather than a simple excision. The case settled after extensive discovery. The defense argued: “the patient should have called the physician.” The settlement provided recovery for suffering through a misdiagnosis and the loss of a spouse and a mother. While the settlement cannot bring this wonderful woman back, it helped her family move forward with life’s challenges and encouraged future accountability.