
The product recall lawyers at The Lyon Firm are investigating new recalls of defective products. Contact our firm to discuss the next steps, and to learn more about the role of government agencies.
Most recalls in the U.S. (roughly 95%) are voluntary. This means manufacturers step in on their own to pull unsafe products from the shelves after spotting safety issues through testing or adverse event reports. By moving first, companies can control messaging and show regulators and courts that they are acting responsibly.
From a legal standpoint, courts will still examine whether the voluntary recall was fast enough or effective. If a company knew of a danger but delayed action, its decision to recall voluntarily may actually bolster claims that it ignored consumer safety.
When voluntary action is deemed insufficient, federal agencies have the power to order mandatory recalls. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) leads most consumer product recalls, while the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) handles vehicles. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversees drugs and medical devices.
A mandatory recall typically involves formal legal steps such as administrative orders or consent decrees that create binding obligations. For plaintiffs, this is evidence that there may have been a real safety risk.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission covers more than 15,000 types of consumer goods, from children’s toys to kitchen appliances. Its authority includes creating safety standards and imposing substantial penalties for violations.
The agency can negotiate recall agreements and impose multi-million-dollar fines. These actions often overlap with private lawsuits, meaning companies can face simultaneous regulatory and civil claims.
These actions often move together as the CPSC’s findings will play a major role in product liability suits filed on the consumer's behalf. When the agency concludes that a product poses a significant safety risk, that determination can support claims of negligence or strict liability.
For this reason, some companies stall recalls because they fear admitting liability. They worry that recalling a product will be seen as acknowledging defect. Despite regulatory pressure and developing safety concerns, many companies still hesitate to issue recalls, potentially because of the financial fallout. The direct costs of replacing products and potential long-term damage to brand reputation can be huge.
Of course, the longer a dangerous product stays on the market, the higher the risk of injury and the stronger the evidence that profits were placed above consumer safety.

Taking the first step doesn’t have to be complicated. In just a few minutes, you can share the basics of your case, and our team will guide you from there: