Product Liability Lawyer reviewing cases and lawsuits for injured clients and plaintiffs nationwide

.avif)



Helmets should be life-saving devices, but they fail far too often and the results can be devastating. Defective helmet lawsuits serve two purposes: compensating victims and forcing manufacturers to produce safer equipment in the future.
If you or a loved one has been injured due to a defective or unsafe helmet, it is critical to consult an experienced attorney as soon as possible. The Lyon Firm can evaluate your case, explain your rights, and fight for the justice you deserve.
Whether used on motorcycles, bicycles, construction sites, or athletic fields, consumers trust helmets to reduce the risk of serious head injuries. Unfortunately, not every helmet on the market performs as promised. When a helmet fails due to poor design, substandard materials, or inadequate warnings, the consequences can be catastrophic. Victims may suffer concussions, traumatic brain injuries, or even fatalities—all of which can form the basis of a defective helmet lawsuit.
The very idea of defective safety gear and unsafe protective equipment is disturbing, and yet helmet defects may be more common than previously thought. This goes for hardhats, motorcycle and bicycle helmets, as well as sports equipment, including football, hockey, and lacrosse helmets.
The safety outlook is particularly stark for football safety: football helmets, even though they can protect well against skull fractures, do not protect well against concussion injury. In a high-profile football helmet defect case, a jury in Colorado held Riddle accountable for failing to warn football players of the risk of concussions.
Riddell now faces multiple other lawsuits from thousands of former football players. The jury, which awarded $11.5 million in damages, said that Riddell’s helmets were defective in the sense that the company failed to properly and thoroughly warn athletes of the dangers.
The plaintiff and their attorney argued the company knew they had a problem testing their product many years ago, and failed to disclose that information.
Joe Lyon is an experienced consumer safety lawyer and product liability attorney reviewing helmet defect lawsuits for plaintiffs nationwide.
Head injuries are the primary cause of death and spinal injury among motorcycle drivers. If a helmet is defective, the risk may be similar to not even wearing one.
Helmets have prevented thousands of head, brain, and neck injuries on motorcycles and bicycles, and it is critical that the helmets meet safety standards, and designed to absorb as much of an impact as possible.
Safety standards have been established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM International) but not every manufacturer meets the minimum requirements. During sports accidents or road accidents, the most common injuries linked to defective helmets include:

Helmets are supposed to meet strict safety standards before reaching consumers. Yet, many still make it to market with flaws that compromise protection. Common types of failures include:
These failures are not minor inconveniences. A defective helmet can mean the difference between walking away from an accident or sustaining a lifelong brain injury.
When pursuing compensation, attorneys often rely on product liability laws. Several theories may apply:
Each case depends on the facts, including how the helmet was marketed, tested, and sold. Skilled legal representation can help uncover internal records, design flaws, and regulatory violations that strengthen a claim.
Liability does not always fall solely on the helmet manufacturer. Potentially responsible parties may include:
By identifying all responsible entities, victims improve their chances of recovering full compensation.
To be effective and prevent head injury, a helmet must be well-manufactured, meet design and safety standards set by the U.S. Department of Transportation, and should be tested properly by a third party. Consumers should only buy motorcycle helmets compliant with federal standards.
The Consumer Product & Safety Commission (CPSC) has the authority to issue recalls for Cycling Accidents, and has in years past. When helmets fail to meet minimal requirements. Helmet issues may include the following defects:
In successful helmet defect lawsuits, plaintiffs have alleged that manufacturing or design defects have directly lead to severe head and neck injuries. There is a consensus among safety experts that products that do not conform with federal standards should be kept off the market.
It is usually assumed by consumers that buying and wearing a helmet protects them from a potential accident, though that is unfortunately not the case. Following a bike crash or a serious sports injury, it is crucial to preserve evidence and contact a product liability lawyer.

.jpg)
Damages in defective helmet cases can be significant due to the severity of head and brain injuries. Plaintiffs may seek:
If a helmet cracked, failed to absorb impact, or performed worse than expected in an accident, it may have been defective. A product liability attorney can consult experts to determine whether the helmet was unreasonably dangerous.
Manufacturers must anticipate normal use and foreseeable misuse. If poor instructions or unclear warnings contributed to improper use, liability may still exist.
No. While recalls can strengthen a claim, individuals may pursue lawsuits even if the helmet has not been officially recalled.
Deadlines, known as statutes of limitations, vary by state. In many states, product liability claims generally must be filed within two years of the injury.
Taking the first step doesn’t have to be complicated. In just a few minutes, you can share the basics of your case, and our team will guide you from there: