
The Lyon Firm has actively contributed to numerous consumer class action settlements, helping secure meaningful relief for consumers and class members across a wide range of cases. The list below includes cases where the Firm played various active roles in contributing to the success of the case. Specific titles, roles, and settlement benefits are included below:
In re Advocate Aurora Health Pixel Litigation
$12,225,000 Settlement fund
Henderson v. Reventics, LLC
$8,125,000 Settlement fund
In re The Christ Hospital Pixel Litigation
$7,000,000 Settlement fund
Allen et al. v. Novant Health, Inc.
$6,660,000 Non-reversionary common fund
Doe v. SSM Health Care Corporation et al., Case No. 2422-CC00208-01 (City of St. Louis, Mo.): Plaintiff’s Counsel; claims-made settlement fund for the benefit of 1,231,345 class members.
Baker, et al. v. Parkmobile, LLC, Case No. 1:21-CV-2182 (N.D. Ga.): Appointed Steering Committee; Plaintiffs’ Counsel for lead class representatives; non-reversionary fund, credit, enhanced data security practices, and an admin fund provided broad relief to 21 million class members.
In re Lakeview Loan Servicing Data Breach Litigation, Case No. 1:22-cv-20955 (S.D. Fla.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel (Lead Plaintiff); non-reversionary fund settlement provided broad relief to 5,802,065 class members.
Doe v. HSCGP LLC, Case No. 23C2513 (Davidson County, Tenn.): Plaintiff’s Counsel; claims-made monetary settlement fund and secured enhanced healthcare digital privacy practices provided broad relief to 646,775 class members.
In re Arthur Gallagher Data Breach Litigation, Case No. 1:22-cv-0137 (N.D. Ill.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured enhanced data security practices provided broad relief to 3,491,654 class members.
Miller v. NextGen Healthcare, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-02043 (N.D. Ga.): Appointed Executive Committee; Plaintiffs’ Counsel for lead class representative; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 1,049,396 class members.
Layman v. Legacy Health, Case No. 25cv40104 (Multnomah County, Or.): Appointed Class Counsel; claims-made monetary fund, offered CyEx Privacy Shield, and secured enhanced healthcare digital privacy practices provided broad relief to 954,116 class members.
Devine v. Health Aide of Ohio, Case No. cv-21-948117 (Cuyahoga County, Ohio): Appointed Class Counsel; cash payment fund and secured enhanced data security practices provided broad relief to 141,149 patients.
In re The Christ Hospital Pixel Litigation, Case No. A2204749, Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County, Ohio: Appointed co-lead counsel; final approval of a $7,000,000 hybrid settlement fund for 323,000 class members.
In re Advocate Aurora Pixel Litigation, Case No. 22-cv-1253 (E.D. Wis.): Plaintiff’s Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 2,540,567 class members.
Hawkins v. Navy Federal Credit Union, Case No: 1:19-cv-01186 (E.D. Va.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided relief to 66,000 class members.
Tracy et al. v. Elekta, Inc., Case No. 1:21-cv-02851 (N.D. Ga.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and enhanced data security practices provided broad relief to 489,932 class members.
Sherwood v. Horizon Actuarial, Case No. 1-22-cv-01495 (N.D. Ga.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 4,386,969 class members.
In re City of Hope, Case No. 24STCV09935 (LA County, Cal.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 777,039 class members.
Henderson v. Reventics, LLC, Case No. 2025CV30456 (Colo. Dist. Ct.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 4.2 million class members.
In re Berry Dunn Data Security Incident Settlement, Case No. 2:24-cv-00146 (D. Me.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel; non-reversionary common fund, and secure data security enhancements provided broad relief to 2,204,639 class members.
Allen et al. v. Novant Health, Inc., Case No. 1:22-cv-00697 (M.D.N.C.): Plaintiff's Counsel; court-approved non-reversionary common fund of $6,660,000 for the benefit of 1.3 million class members.
In re Navvis & Co., LLC Data Breach Litigation, Case No. 4:24-cv-00029 (E.D. Mo.): Appointed Class Counsel; common fund provided broad relief to 2.8 million class members.
J.C. v. Catholic Health System, Index No. 811968/2025 (Sup. Ct., Erie County): Appointed Class Counsel; claims-made monetary fund, offered CyEx Privacy Shield, and secured enhanced patient digital privacy practices provided broad relief to 215,000 class members.
In re Group Health Plan Litigation, Civ. No. 23-267 (D. Minn.): Plaintiff’s Counsel; common fund settlement provided broad relief to 971,305 class members.
In re HealthEC LLC Data Breach Litigation, No. 2:24-cv-00026 (Dist. of New Jersey): Appointed Expert Discovery Committee; common fund provided broad relief to 1.6 million class members.
Owens v. US Radiology Specialist, Inc., Case No. 22 CVS 17797 (Mecklenburg County, NC): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 1.3 million class members.
Culbertson, et al. v. Deloitte Consulting LLP, Case No. 1:20-cv-3962 (S.D.N.Y.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel (Lead Plaintiff); Third-Party Discovery Committee member; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 200,000 class members.
St. James v. Partnership Health Plan of California, Case No. FC059095 (Solano County, Cal.): Plaintiff’s Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 854,000 class members.
In re American Financial Resources Data Breach, Case No. 2:22-cv-01757 (D.N.J.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel (Lead Plaintiffs); non-reversionary common fund and reversionary claims-made fund provided broad relief to 216,645 current and former customers.
Okonoski et al. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Case No. 1:23-cv-01548 (N.D. Ohio): Plaintiffs’ Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 350,000 class members.
Desue, et al. v. 20/20 Eye Care, Case No. 21-cv-61275 (S.D. Fla.): Appointed Executive Committee; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to two million class members.
Gay et al. v. Garnet Health, Case No. 7:23-cv-06950 (S.D.N.Y.): Appointed Class Counsel; claims-made cash fund, offered privacy product subscription, and secured enhanced healthcare digital privacy practices provided broad relief to 134,324 class members.
In re: Great Expressions Data Security Incident Litigation, Case No. 2:23-cv-11185 (E.D. Mich.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured data security enhancements provided broad relief to two million class members.
In re: Great Expressions Data Security Incident Litigation, Case No. 2:23-cv-11185 (E.D. Mich.) (J. Grey): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured data security enhancements provided broad relief to two million class members.
In re: NCB Management Services, Inc. Data Breach Litigation, Case No. 2:23-cv-01236 (E.D. Pa.): Appointed Class Counsel; common fund provided broad relief to 1,471,019 class members.
Phillips v. Bay Bridge Administrators, No. 1:23-cv-00022 (W.D. Tex.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 251,689 class members.
In re: Panera Data Security Litigation, Case No. 4:24-cv-00847 (E.D. Mo.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel; Lead Plaintiff in state court track; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 954,116 class members.
Gilbert v. Bioplus Specialty Pharmacy Services, LLC, Case No. 6:21-cv-02158 (M.D. Fla.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel; non-reversionary common fund, reversionary claims-made fund provided broad relief to 335,000 class members.
Rodriguez v. Professional Finance Company, Inc., Case No. 22-cv-01679 (D. Colo.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured cybersecurity enhancements provided broad relief to two million current and former customers.
In re Southern Ohio Health System Data Breach, Case No. A-2101886 (Hamilton County, Ohio): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured business practices changes provided broad relief to 420,000 former and current patients.
Tucker v. Marietta Area Health Care, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00184 (S.D. Ohio): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and data security enhancements provided broad relief to 213,657 current and former patients.
Migliaccio v. Parker Hannifin Corp., Case No. 1:22-cv-00835 (N.D. Ohio): Appointed co-lead class counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured data security enhancements provided broad relief to 115,843 class members.
Wade v. U.S. Bank National Association, Case No. A-1501522 (Hamilton County, Ohio): Appointed Class Counsel; reversionary common fund providing relief to 42,000 class members.
Jarrell v. Adena Health System, Case No. 25CI00419 (Ross County, Ohio): Appointed Class Counsel; claims-made cash fund and secured enhanced healthcare digital privacy practices provided broad relief to 76,348 class members.
K.B. (Minor) v. East Tennessee Children’s Hospital Association, Inc., Case No. C2LA0081 (Anderson County, Tenn.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary settlement fund provided broad relief for 433,531 class members.
In re: Hope College Data Security Breach Litigation, Case No. 1:22-cv-01224 (W.D. Mich.): Plaintiffs’ Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 166,924 class members.
Flores v. Aon, Case No. 2022-CH-06132 (Cook County, Ill.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided broad relief to 155,132 former and current employees.
Lawless v. DC Health Link, Case No. 2023-CAB-001569 (D.C. Super. Ct.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured enhanced data security business practices provided relief to 252,021 class members.
In re C.R. England, Data Breach Litigation, Case No. 6:22-cv-374 (D. Utah): Plaintiff’s Counsel; Final Approval for non-reversionary common fund providing broad relief to 224,000 class members
In re Houser LLP Data Breach Litigation, Case No. 8:24-cv-00468 (C.D. Cal.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured enhanced data security business practices provided broad relief to 372,215 class members.
Engle v. Talbert House, Case No. A 2103650 (Hamilton County, Ohio): Appointed Class Counsel; claims-made settlement fund provided broad relief to 303,000 class members.
Gleason v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas, Case No. DC-22-14875 (Dallas, Tex.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured enhanced cybersecurity practices provided broad relief to 125,000 class members.
Forslund v. RR Donnelly, Case No. 1:22-cv-04260 (N.D. Ill.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured enhanced cybersecurity practices provided broad relief to 81,642 class members.
Pederson v. AAA Collections, Inc., Case No. 4:22-cv-04166 (D.N.D): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured enhanced cybersecurity practices provided broad relief to 66,732 class members.
Reynolds v. Concordia University, St. Paul, Case No. 21-2560 (D. Minn.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided tuition reimbursement benefits to 505 class members.
Hasell v. Spear Wilderman P.C., Case No. 230401942 (C.P. Phila. County): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and secured enhanced cybersecurity practices provided broad relief to 86,287 class members.
Bae v. Pacific City Bank, Case No. 21STCV45922 (L.A. Super. Ct.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund and enhanced cybersecurity measures provided monetary and non-monetary benefits to class members.
Miranda v. Xavier University, Case No. 1:20-cv-00539 (S.D. Ohio): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund provided tuition reimbursement for 494 class members.
McKitrick v. Allwell Behavioral, Case No. CH2022-0174 (Muskingum County, Ohio): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund for the benefits of around 30,000 class members.
Hoyle v. Harrington Raceway, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-00420 (D. Del.): Appointed Class Counsel; non-reversionary common fund for roughly 11,000 class members.
Taking the first step doesn’t have to be complicated. In just a few minutes, you can share the basics of your case, and our team will guide you from there: