
Healthcare patients have long complained about often being asked to agree to treatment without knowing what it will ultimately cost. A patient may receive a price estimate for a procedure and schedule an appointment and later receive separate bills for a facility fee, physician fee, anesthesia fee, laboratory fee or other billing add-on.
The Federal Trade Commission is now putting healthcare providers on notice for incomplete pricing and a general lack of transparency.
On October 5, 2026, Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson sent warning letters to 24 of the nation's largest healthcare services companies. The letters state that giving patients incomplete, inaccurate or late pricing information can be an unfair or deceptive practice under Section 5 of the FTC Act.
The agency aimed its message at routine, non-emergency care that patients schedule in advance. The FTC specifically named physician and facility fees as charges that can make a quoted price incomplete.
Our attorneys are investigating hidden fees and deceptive billing practices by healthcare management. A single facility fee often runs a few hundred dollars. Class actions let many patients with the same alleged problem pursue claims together. Attorneys can also look for patterns across patients, such as whether a provider repeatedly quoted prices without a charge it knew would apply.
The FTC has not identified the companies that received the letters, and the template letter says it is not an assessment of any recipient's practices. The agency framed the letters as a reminder of existing obligations and urged each company to review how it discloses prices. The letters would not have been sent, however, if there wasn't a widespread improper billing issue.
The letters also address hospitals that already follow federal price transparency rules. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services requires hospitals to post standard charges and consumer-friendly pricing for shoppable services.
The FTC calls those rules a baseline. A hospital can meet them and still face questions under the FTC Act if its price quotes leave patients with a false impression.
A facility fee is a charge for the costs of running a hospital or a hospital-affiliated site, such as space, equipment, supplies and support staff. It differs from the professional fee that pays a physician for medical services. When a patient receives care in a hospital-owned setting, the doctor and the facility can each send a separate bill. On a statement, the charge may appear as a facility fee, facility charge or hospital services fee.
Hospital facility fees also show up outside the hospital itself. Many health systems own outpatient clinics and physician offices, and some bill those visits as hospital outpatient services. The waiting room and exam room may look identical to a private practice, yet the claim can include a facility charge that an independent office would not add.
Facility fees are not unlawful on their face. Providers may charge them, and the amount a patient owes depends on insurance coverage, negotiated rates, deductibles and the site of care. The legal question is whether the provider told patients about the charge in a clear and timely way.
Timing drives most of the frustration. A patient may hear one price at scheduling, complete a doctor's visit, and then find a separate facility bill weeks later. By then the care is complete and the chance to shop around is gone. The advocacy group U.S. PIRG Education Fund says these charges range from a few dollars to thousands of dollars.
The same group reported that fifteen states had passed some form of legislation to restrict facility fees, collect data on them or require patient notice as of March 2024.
Those laws vary widely, so a patient's rights can depend on where treatment took place. Check your state's rules and do not assume federal law is the only protection.

Under the FTC's deception framework, a representation or omission is deceptive when it is likely to mislead a reasonable consumer and matters to the decision to buy. The agency looks at the overall impression a transaction creates, not a single sentence pulled from the rest.
Take a hospital that quotes $2,000 for a procedure while knowing a $750 facility charge will follow. If the patient learns of the second charge only after committing to care, that sequence invites scrutiny. A disclosure buried in a billing packet after the visit may not remedy an earlier impression.
Several facts tend to matter in a dispute:
Under the No Surprises Act, uninsured and self-pay patients who schedule care generally must receive a good faith estimate before treatment. CMS says the estimate should list expected charges, including facility and hospital fees.
If the final bill runs at least $400 above the estimate from that provider, the patient may qualify for a federal payment dispute process, and the request generally must begin within 120 days of the bill date. An estimate is not a guarantee, and the process does not reach every insured patient or every billing dispute.
On October 2, 2026, the FTC and the Utah and Nevada attorneys general sued Lens.com. The complaint alleges the company advertised low contact lens prices and then added a mandatory "Taxes & fees" charge at checkout that routinely doubled the cost.
Lens.com has not been found liable, and the case involves contact lenses, not healthcare. It does show, however, how regulators view a headline price that leaves out charges the seller knows will apply.
The best way is to ask before you schedule. Find out whether the clinic belongs to a hospital or health system and whether the visit will generate a separate facility bill. Request the estimate in writing and ask that it include both the professional and facility components. Save screenshots of any online price tool. It seems unreasonable to have to take these measures, but that is in fact the only way to protect yourself.
After treatment, request an itemized bill and compare it with your insurer's explanation of benefits. If the bill includes a facility charge you never heard about, keep every record of what you were told and when. Notes from phone calls, emails and portal messages can all become useful.
The Lyon Firm represents consumers nationwide in class action cases, including medical malpractice and healthcare privacy matters.
The Firm works on contingency and offers free consultations, so clients do not pay out of pocket to learn whether they have a claim. If a provider quoted you a price that left out mandatory charges, including a hospital facility fee, contact The Lyon Firm to discuss your options. No outcome is guaranteed.
The FTC has not named the companies that received its letters and has not found any of them in violation of the law. The Lens.com case remains in litigation, and its allegations have not been proven. This article does not accuse any provider of wrongdoing.
Taking the first step doesn’t have to be complicated. In just a few minutes, you can share the basics of your case, and our team will guide you from there: